Bug: a88/c5a
ID : | c5ad013c-e1db-47ec-9a65-662aaee6781d |
Short name : | a88/c5a |
Status : | fixed |
Severity : | minor |
Assigned : | |
Reporter : | Pontus Lurcock <pont@ou094023> |
Creator : | Pontus Lurcock <pont@ou094023> |
Created : | Tue, 21 Oct 2008 05:46:26 +0000 |
Target : | 0.9 |
Summary : | Sensible units for intensity values [1] |
Comment: |
--------- Comment --------- ID: b26f3745-dbc2-4d81-b85c-a6938e022135 Short name: a88/c5a/b26 From: Pontus Lurcock <pont@talvi.net> Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2009 00:31:59 +0000 I'm assuming that this relates to the values displayed on the on-graph data table, since the values on graph axes are automatically scaled. |
Comment: |
--------- Comment --------- ID: f727b684-6e24-4dac-9697-4d9bd60def7e Short name: a88/c5a/f72 From: Pontus Lurcock <pont@talvi.net> Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2009 00:47:05 +0000 Looks as though this was fixed some time ago -- values are now displayed inscientific notation and no overall OOM scaling is applied. Unsure how to interpret C's last sentence there, but it seems to be a vague notion rather than a definite feature request, so I'm closing this now on the assumption that if he really wants a "self correcting feature" he'll ask for it again, at which point I can ask him what he means. (Asking him now, over email to the JOIDES Resolution, what he meant 5+ months ago would probably not be worthwhile.) |
ID: ef1a98f3-6958-4ee7-84fe-ae1d98ef719c
Short name: a88/c5a/ef1
From: Pontus Lurcock <pont@ou094023>
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 05:46:26 +0000